Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822787›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024

Early childhood caries (ECC) prediction models using Machine Learning.

Daniel José Blanco-Victorio, Roxana Patricia López-Ramos, Johan Daniel Blanco-Rodriguez, Nieves Asteria López-Luján, Gina Fiorella León-Untiveros, Ana Lucy Siccha-Macassi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel José Blanco-VictorioFacultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Lima. Perú.
Roxana Patricia López-RamosUniversidad Científica del Sur. Lima. Perú.
Johan Daniel Blanco-RodriguezFacultad de Ingeniería, Escuela de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Universidad de Lima. Perú.
Nieves Asteria López-LujánHospital Santa María del Socorro, Ica-Perú.
Gina Fiorella León-UntiverosFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional del Callao. Perú.
Ana Lucy Siccha-MacassiFaculty of Sciencies of Health. Universidad Nacional del Callao.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the performance of different prediction models based on machine learning to predict the presence of early childhood caries. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study. The sociodemographic and clinical data used came from a sample of 186 children aged 3 to 6 years and their respective parents or guardians treated at a Hospital in Ica, Peru. The database with significant variables was loaded into the Orange Data Mining software to be processed with different prediction models based on Machine Learning. To evaluate the performance of the prediction models, the following indicators were used: precision, recall, F1-score and accuracy. The discriminatory power of the model was determined by the value of the ROC curve. Results: 76.88% of the children evaluated had cavities. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Neural Network (NN) models obtained the best performance values, showing similar values of accuracy, F1-score and recall (0.927, 0.950 and 0.974; respectively). The probability of correctly distinguishing a child with ECC was 90.40% for the SVM model and 86.68% for the NN model. Conclusions: The Machine Learning-based caries prediction models with the best performance were Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Neural Networks (NN).

Identifiers

PMID39822787
PMCPMC11733900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.