ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Mesenchymal stem cell therapies evidence in the treatment of irradiated salivary glands: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell and Gene Therapy for Patients Suffering from Xerostomia (Dry Mouth): Positioning Extracellular Vesicles as the Bridge Between Biomarker Discovery and Regenerative Therapy in Xerostomia-A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles derived from dental mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine: a scoping review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy is one of the main treatments for head and neck cancer; however, due to its non-selectivity the glandular tissue can be affected. This scoping review aimed to identify the evidence about mesenchymal stem cell therapies for irradiated salivary gland regeneration. Material and Methods: Two independent reviewers performed a literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria were: 1) studies evaluation regeneration of irradiated salivary glands by stem cell therapies (cell-based or cell-free), (2) Results: The search resulted in 13 included studies. In general, both therapies demonstrated increased salivary levels, with mucin and amylase increased and structural protection of acinar cells. The cell-free therapy based on labial glands stem cell extract demonstrated a higher number of parasympathetic nerves. Conclusions: Stem cell therapies (cell-free and cell-based) appear promising strategies for recovering saliva production in patients presenting irradiation-induced hyposalivation, with positive results toward regeneration of the form and function of the glands. However, due to the scarcity and heterogenicity of these pre-clinical studies, it is not possible to indicate which is the more indicated therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.