ArticleEJC paediatric oncology2024
Response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors in high-risk neuroblastoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Article in EJC paediatric oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ATRX large deletions and truncating mutations are associated with primary induction chemotherapy resistance in high-risk neuroblastoma: a multicenter propensity-weighted cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Histologic Response to Induction Chemotherapy in High-Risk Neuroblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Response to induction chemotherapy has been shown to predict outcome in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), with those achieving a complete response (CR) having superior outcomes. Methods: We evaluated whether conventional prognostic factors remain prognostic in subsets of patients defined by response to induction. 1244 Patients from four COG high-risk trials were included. End-induction response was coded as CR, partial response (PR) or better, less than PR without progressive disease (PD), and PD. Cox regression models were performed to calculate event-free and overall survival (EFS, OS) hazard ratios, including interaction terms between induction response and prognostic factors including sex, age, stage, primary tumor location, LDH, ferritin, ploidy, Results: Among patients who achieved a CR after induction, INSS stage 4 disease and trial era were the only factors that remained significantly associated with inferior OS. For those who achieved less than a PR, adrenal primary site, Conclusion: The impact of conventional prognostic factors is not static in patients with HR-NB. Instead, response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors. These data can help to further refine prognosis for patients with variable responses to induction and help to identify candidates who might benefit from treatment other than standard post-induction therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.