ArticleData in brief2024
Semantic segmentation dataset of Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS) rural landscape Street View Images.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban focused semantically segmented datasets (e.g. ADE20k or CoCo) have been crucial in boosting research and applications in urban areas by providing rich sources of delineated objects in Street View Images (SVI). However, there is a lack of similar datasets for agricultural and rural landscapes. By focusing on such underrepresented landscapes, we created a dataset containing images with visually segmented objects that were labeled following a thematically relevant set of classes. The dataset contains 1784 north-looking landscape images with their corresponding annotated masks from across Europe. Images were sourced from the Land Use and Coverage Area frame Survey (LUCAS), following a strict sampling and acquisition protocol. Objects were fully delineated on the street (eye) level or so-called landscape images for a set of 35 relevant classes (e.g. cropped fields, dense woody features, field margins, stone walls). This modest dataset, due to the cost of segmentation, might provide limitations for some applications (due to class imbalances). However, initial segmentation labels open the potential for the rapid (semi-supervised) growth of a larger dataset using LUCAS or other street level imagery. Although uncertainties remain, this annotated dataset is a first step toward integrating LUCAS image data within a landscape segmentation context. This can support land-use and land-cover change assessments, comparison and integration with Earth Observation based products, improved structural characterization of vegetation, as well as biodiversity and landscape heterogeneity monitoring. The data are structured in two folders which store the images and the masks. Also included is a csv file with the label and codes corresponding to the masks and another csv file data with geolocation information and ancillary data derived from the Harmonized LUCAS in-situ land-cover and land-use database for each image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.