Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822711›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health reports2020

Effect of integrating postpartum family planning into the health extension program in Ethiopia on postpartum adoption of modern contraception.

Deborah Sitrin, Gebi H Jima, Anne Pfitzer, China Wondimu, Tigist Worku Belete, Tsigue Pleah, Berhane Assefa, Tenaye Kebede, Efrem Regassa, Ezedin Aman Usman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deborah SitrinUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Gebi H JimaArsi University, Assela, Ethiopia.
Anne PfitzerUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
China WondimuUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tigist Worku BeleteUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tsigue PleahJhpiego, Conakry, Guinea.
Berhane AssefaMinistry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tenaye KebedeMinistry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Efrem RegassaOromia Regional Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ezedin Aman UsmanUSAID's Maternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saifuddin AhmedDepartment of Population Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ethiopia has large unmet need for contraception among postpartum women. Community-level services may improve postpartum contraceptive use in Ethiopia and other contexts where home childbirth is common. This study estimated the additional effect of systematically integrating messages on postpartum family planning (PPFP) into community contacts with pregnant and postpartum women, on top of integrated facility contacts. Methods: The quasi-experimental study was conducted in two districts in Oromia Regional State and used a controlled trial design with random assignment of primary health care units-a health center and surrounding health posts-to intervention and comparison arms. We used the log-rank test and fitted a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for differences in contraceptive uptake by arm. Time from delivery to uptake of modern contraception was the outcome variable. We separately analyzed subsets of women by place of delivery, as this variable interacts with the study arm. Results: A total of 772 pregnant women were enrolled February-March 2017 and re-interviewed 15 months later (May 2018). Loss to follow-up was 10% in intervention, 7% in comparison areas. Among women who delivered at home, there was higher PPFP adoption by one year postpartum in the intervention arm (35.2%, 95% CI: 28.8-42.4%) versus comparison arm (27.8%, 95% CI: 22.2-34.4%). In the adjusted Cox regression model, women who delivered at home in the intervention arm were 45% more likely to adopt contraception (adjHR1.45, CI: 1.01-2.07). There was no difference by arm for women who delivered in a facility. Conclusions: Integrating PPFP into community-level services for pregnant and postpartum women and infants may have additional benefit on top of PPFP services at facilities. The intervention benefited women who delivered at home, an important target population in countries like Ethiopia, where many women do not deliver in a facility. This study, implemented under real world conditions, informs the PPFP body of evidence and fills a gap in research on the contribution of community-based PPFP in contexts where services are integrated within maternal, newborn, and child health care in facilities.

Indexed as

community health workersfamily planningpostpartum

Identifiers

PMID39822711
PMCPMC11737598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.