Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822707›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025

Comparative analysis of intraoperative thermal and optical imaging for identification of the human primary sensory cortex.

Juliane Müller, Martin Oelschlägel, Stephan B Sobottka, Matthias Kirsch, Gerald Steiner, Edmund Koch, Christian Schnabel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliane MüllerTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensing and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Martin OelschlägelTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensing and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Stephan B SobottkaTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Dresden, Germany.
Matthias KirschTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Dresden, Germany.
Gerald SteinerTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensing and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Edmund KochTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensing and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-2178
Christian SchnabelTU Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensing and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: The precise identification and preservation of functional brain areas during neurosurgery are crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing postoperative deficits. Intraoperative imaging plays a vital role in this context, offering insights that guide surgeons in protecting critical cortical regions. Aim: We aim to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intraoperative thermal imaging (ITI) and intraoperative optical imaging (IOI) in detecting the primary somatosensory cortex, providing a detailed assessment of their potential integration into surgical practice. Approach: Data from nine patients undergoing tumor resection in the region of the somatosensory cortex were analyzed. Both IOI and ITI were employed simultaneously, with a specific focus on the areas identified as the primary somatosensory cortex (S1 region). The methodologies included a combination of imaging techniques during distinct phases of rest and stimulation, confirmed by electrophysiological monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials to verify the functional areas identified by both imaging methods. The data were analyzed using a Fourier-based analytical framework to distinguish physiological signals from background noise. Results: Both ITI and IOI successfully generated reliable activity maps following median nerve stimulation. IOI showed greater consistency across various clinical scenarios, including those involving cortical tumors. Quantitative analysis revealed that IOI could more effectively differentiate genuine neuronal activity from artifacts compared with ITI, which was occasionally prone to false positives in the presence of cortical abnormalities. Conclusions: ITI and IOI produce comparable functional maps with moderate agreement in Cohen's kappa values. Their distinct physiological mechanisms suggest complementary use in specific clinical scenarios, such as cortical tumors or impaired neurovascular coupling. IOI excels in spatial resolution and mapping reliability, whereas ITI provides additional insights into metabolic changes and tissue properties, especially in pathological areas. Combined, these modalities could enhance the understanding and analysis of functional and pathological processes in complex neurosurgical cases.

Indexed as

Monitoring, IntraoperativeOptical ImagingSomatosensory CortexThermographyAdultAgedBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedfunctional brain mappingneurosurgical imaging techniquesoptical imagingthermal imaging

Identifiers

PMID39822707
PMCPMC11737595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.