Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822665›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science

Evaluating the economic viability of hepatitis E virus serological screening among blood donors: A prospective study from India for advancing blood safety.

Sangthang Singson, Shamee Shastry, G Somu, Kiran Chawla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sangthang SingsonDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shamee ShastryDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
G SomuDepartment of Hospital Administration, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kiran ChawlaDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis E virus (HEV) stands out as a significant transfusion-transmissible infection, yet it is not included in the screening protocols of many countries. The present study was conducted to assess the cost-benefit implications of incorporating HEV screening among blood donors which is one of the preventive strategies in reducing transfusion transmissible HEV. METHODOLOGY: A decision tree model was prepared to assist the cost-benefit analysis. The serological screening cost of HEV was estimated based with fixed and variable cost. The cost of illness was estimated with direct and indirect cost. Net present value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was used to measure the economic variability of screening HEV among the blood donors.

resultsThe unit cost of HEV IgM antibody screening is 1000 INR, and the unit cost of illness due to HEV infection is INR 80,122. The NPV and BCR is INR 6,73,001 and 1.7:1 for the probable transfusion-transmitted HEV infection that was averted by the screening of HEV among the blood donors.

conclusionConsidering the risk of probable HEV transmission through blood transfusion, the study suggests that screening HEV among the blood donors is beneficial in averting transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.

Indexed as

Blood transfusioncost-benefit analysishepatitis E virus

Identifiers

PMID39822665
PMCPMC11734772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.