ArticleBurns & trauma2025
Article in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D as a cellular endocrine system: Tissue-specific microcircuits, immune reprogramming, and metabolic resistance.iScience · 2026Review
- Metabolic reprogramming and ferroptosis in keloid pathogenesis: new insights for targeted therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Comment on "ANKRD46 as a shared diagnostic and therapeutic marker in keloid and type 2 diabetes mellitus identified via multi omics and experimental validation".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Update on Keloid Management.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous fibrosis disease: from mechanisms to therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A panoramic analysis of keloid pathogenesis: multidimensional network regulation of genetics-immunity-metabolism-mechanical force.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Vitamin D and the aging skin: insights into oxidative stress, inflammation, and barrier function.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2025Review
- Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloids: Epidemiology, Molecular Pathogenesis, and Therapeutic Interventions.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Keloids are disfiguring, fibrotic scar-like lesions that are challenging to treat and commonly recur after therapy. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving keloid formation is necessary for the development of more effective therapies. Reduced vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression has been observed in keloids, implicating vitamin D signaling in keloid pathology. Vitamin D exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting it could have therapeutic utility in keloid disorder. The current study investigated vitamin D-regulated gene expression in keloid keratinocytes and the effects of inhibiting an enzyme involved in vitamin D metabolism on the phenotype of keloid-derived keratinocytes. Methods: Normal and keloid-derived primary keratinocytes were isolated from normal skin and keloid lesions, respectively, and were cultured in the absence or presence of vitamin D. In some experiments, inhibitors of the vitamin D metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1, ketoconazole or VID400 were added in the absence or presence of vitamin D. Cellular proliferation, migration and gene expression were measured. Results: We observed significant overexpression of Conclusions: The data suggest that reduction of vitamin D inactivation with CYP24A1 inhibitors may reduce profibrotic gene expression in keloid-derived cells. Therefore, CYP24A1 inhibitors may serve as adjunctive therapies to suppress keloid-associated gene expression changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.