ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Application of subspecialty standardized temperature management process in a hybrid surgery for acute aortic dissection.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effect of a subspecialty standardized temperature management process in a hybrid surgery for treating acute aortic dissection.
methodsFrom January 2020 to June 2021, 102 patients who underwent hybrid surgery for acute aortic dissection in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at the Huai'an First People's Hospital were selected as the control group, receiving routine temperature maintenance measures. From August 2021 to November 2022, 105 similar patients from the same hospital were enrolled in the experimental group, where a subspecialty standardized temperature management process was implemented. The incidence of hypothermia, Grade 4 shivering, and temperature changes at different time points during surgery were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe experimental group had significantly lower rates of postoperative hypothermia (7.62% vs. 17.65%, P=0.03) and Grade 4 shivering (0.00% vs. 6.86%, P=0.019) compared to the control group. Furthermore, temperature monitoring at different time points during surgery showed that patients in the experimental group had higher temperatures than those in the control group upon entering the operating room (P=0.000), half an hour after anesthesia induction, at the end of surgery, upon leaving the operating room, and upon leaving the post-anesthesia care unit (all P<0.001).
conclusionThe implementation of a subspecialty standardized temperature management process in hybrid surgery operating rooms effectively maintains the required body temperature during hybrid surgery for acute aortic dissection, thereby reducing the incidence of postoperative hypothermia and shivering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.