ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Endobutton plates demonstrate superior efficacy in treating unstable distal clavicle fractures.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of clavicular hook plates and Endobutton plates in treating unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs).
methodsData from 95 patients with UDCFs (Neer II and V types) were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 55 cases were treated with clavicular hook plates (control group), and 40 cases with Endobutton plates (research group). Comparative analyses included intraoperative indicators (incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operation time), postoperative recovery metrics (fracture healing time, fracture displacement distance, hospitalization time), pain assessment (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), shoulder joint function (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] questionnaire), postoperative complications (plate loosening, recurrent fractures, incision infection, and fracture end redisplacement), and overall clinical efficacy.
resultsThe research group demonstrated significantly shorter incision lengths, comparable intraoperative blood loss, longer operation times, and shorter fracture healing times compared to the control group (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in fracture displacement distance or hospitalization time (both P > 0.05). However, VAS scores were significantly lower, while ASES scores (pain, function, and total) were notably higher in the research group (all P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups (P > 0.05), but the excellent and good treatment rate was significantly higher in the research group (P < 0.05).
conclusionsEndobutton plates offer significantly better clinical outcomes compared to clavicular hook plates for treating UDCFs, demonstrating advantages in postoperative recovery, pain management, and functional improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.