Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822517›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Analysis of the efficacy of lactulose combined with polyethylene glycol in the treatment of functional constipation.

Jing Jiang, Ning Liu, Yuanhong Yang, Yafeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing JiangAnorectal Department, Suining Central Hospital Suining 629000, Sichuan, China.
Ning LiuAnorectal Department, Suining Central Hospital Suining 629000, Sichuan, China.
Yuanhong YangAnorectal Department, Suining Central Hospital Suining 629000, Sichuan, China.
Yafeng ZhangAnorectal Department, Suining Central Hospital Suining 629000, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study focuses on analyzing the efficacy of lactulose oral solution combined with Macrogol 4000 Powder in the treatment of functional constipation (FC).

methodsA total of 125 FC patients were selected, with 60 cases in a control group, who were treated with lactulose oral solution alone, and 65 cases in a research group, who were treated with lactulose oral solution combined with Macrogol 4000 Powder. The two groups were analyzed and compared in terms of efficacy, symptom recovery, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and Wexner Constipation Scale (WCS) scores, adverse effects, serum indices, and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors affecting the efficacy.

resultsThe total response rate of treatment in the research group was higher than that in the control group, and the symptom recovery was significantly better in the research group. In addition, the research group showed markedly elevated BSFS scores and reduced WCS scores after treatment as compared to the control group. Furthermore, significantly better improvements in various serum indices were determined in the research group. There was no remarkable difference in the incidence of total adverse reactions between groups. Finally, the course of disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and therapeutic method were identified to be factors affecting treatment efficacy in patients with FC.

conclusionsThe efficacy therapeutic of lactulose oral solution combined with Macrogol 4000 Powder in the treatment of FC is promising.

Indexed as

efficacyfunctional constipationLactulose oral solutionMacrogol 4000 powder

Identifiers

PMID39822517
PMCPMC11733358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.