ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and improvement of physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often fall short in providing optimal outcomes.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of warm needle therapy guided by ultrasound on pain relief and physical function in patients with KOA.
methodsIn this retrospective study, the clinical records of patients with KOA undergoing either meloxicam alone or meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy were reviewed. Various parameters, including pain evaluations, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, range of motion for knee flexion, knee society scores, quality of life scores, inflammatory factor levels, and patient satisfaction were comparatively analyzed.
resultsA total of 140 patients were included, including 68 patients treated by Meloxicam and 72 patients treated by Meloxicam and warm needle therapy. Following treatment, the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group exhibited lower pain scores (3.62±1.98 vs. 4.38±1.95, P=0.023), improved WOMAC scores (27.82±8.75 vs. 31.25±8.82, P=0.022), increased range of motion (136.82°±8.58° vs. 133.43°±8.86°, P=0.023), higher knee society scores (93.32±7.21 vs. 90.21±7.78, P=0.016), and superior Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores (81.24±6.33 vs. 78.43±6.85, P=0.013). Furthermore, a significant reduction in inflammatory factors including interleukin-8 (IL-8), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels was observed in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group compared to the meloxicam alone group (all P<0.05). Patient satisfaction was likewise notably higher in the meloxicam combined with warm needle therapy group (8.43±2.15 vs. 7.58±2.24, P=0.024), with a greater proportion of patients willing to recommend the treatment (81.94% vs. 64.71%, P=0.034).
conclusionWarm needle therapy guided by ultrasound, in combination with meloxicam, significantly improves pain relief, physical function, inflammatory modulation, and patient satisfaction in KOA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.