ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Psychological stress level surveys in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and the application effect of using loofah sponges during VSD treatment.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the psychological stress levels in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and evaluate the effects of using a luffa sponge in vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) treatment.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the clinical data from 110 DFU patients treated with VSD at The First People's Hospital of Zunyi (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University) between September 2021 and October 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on psychological stress levels: an observation group (with psychological stress, n=42) and a control group (without psychological stress, n=68). Baseline data were analyzed to identify factors influencing psychological stress. The observation group was further divided into the conventional care group and the loofah fiber care group, each with 21 patients, to evaluate the effect of using a loofah sponge during VSD treatment.
resultsLogistic regression analysis identified Wagner classification and diabetes-related distress levels as significant factors influencing psychological stress (P<0.05). Post-intervention, the loofah fiber care group showed significantly lower scores on HQ-9, GAD-7, and SRSS (all P<0.05). Additionally, the loofah fiber care group showed lower frequencies of ASD dressing changes, shorter wound healing times, shorter hospital stays, and lower VAS pain scores (all P<0.05). Quality of life scores were significantly higher in the loofah fiber care group across all dimensions (P<0.05), and DASS-21 scores were significantly lower post-intervention (P<0.05). The loofah fiber care group also demonstrated significantly better outcomes in Wagner classification and diabetes-related distress levels, with higher patient satisfaction (all P<0.05).
conclusionThis study highlights significant factors influencing psychological stress in patients with DFU and demonstrates that loofah fiber nursing interventions during VSD treatment improve psychological stress, wound healing, and quality of life. This method provides a promising approach to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.