Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822484›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2024

Effects of

Jia-Jia Cai, Jin-Jing Ying, Jing-Hua Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jia-Jia CaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Yuyao People's Hospital Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China.
Jin-Jing YingDepartment of Pediatrics, Yuyao People's Hospital Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China.
Jing-Hua LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Yuyao People's Hospital Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective

methodsWe performed an exhaustive literature review by searching various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, for research articles published before March 2024 on the impact of UU infection on neonates and its association with related diseases. Keywords included "

resultsThirteen studies, published between 2011 and 2024, were included, covering regions of China (two studies), South Korea (three studies), Japan (two studies), Austria (three studies), Germany (one study), Belgium (one study), and Italy (one study). Findings indicate that UU infection significantly increased the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and sepsis in neonates. However, the correlation between UU infection and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was found not to be significant. Additionally, a descriptive analysis of two studies on UU infection's impact on neonatal pneumonia showed no significant correlation.

conclusionUU infection significantly increases the risk of BPD, IVH, and sepsis in newborns.

Indexed as

bronchopulmonary dysplasiaintraventricular hemorrhagenecrotizing enterocolitisneonatal sepsisperiventricular leukomalaciaUreaplasma urealyticum

Identifiers

PMID39822484
PMCPMC11733375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.