ArticleCureus2024
An Interventional Health Education Study to Transition the General Population's Opinion on Organ Donation From Reluctance to Acceptance.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming barriers and enhancing strategies in organ transplantation systems: a systematic review.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOrgan donation refers to the collection of a human organ from a living or deceased donor and its transplantation into a recipient. An organ transplant recipient is a patient with organ failure who will not survive unless he receives a new organ. Although the benefits of organ transplantation are undeniable, there is a significant gap between the number of donors and recipients, as the demand for organs greatly surpasses the available supply. METHODOLOGY: This interventional health education study aimed to increase awareness regarding organ donation through a survey consisting of pre- and post-questionnaires. The study included 226 participants from the general population of Tamil Nadu, aged 18 years or older and of both genders. The study was conducted over three months, from September to November 2023.
resultsOf the 226 study participants, 220 (97.30%) belong to the 18-40 age group, and 154 (68.1%) were female participants. Before the educational intervention, 132 (58.40%) participants were aware of organ donation. After the educational intervention, knowledge about the organ donation card increased from 101 (44.69%) participants to 152 (67.25%), and the inclination to donate organs rose from 128 (56.63%) to 151 (66.81%). Overall, awareness about organ donation improved from 132 (58.40%) to 175 (77.43%). The study noted that 128 (56.63%) participants viewed religious beliefs as a barrier to organ donation, a perception that remained unchanged, with 152 (67.25%) participants still holding this view even after the educational intervention. Conclusion: This interventional health education study aimed to inform the general population about the importance of organ donation in India, where road traffic accidents frequently lead to brain death, and a lack of awareness potentially limits organ donation opportunities. Despite high levels of education, many individuals remain reluctant to donate organs and lack an organ donor card. Although there is a strong willingness to donate, registration rates remain low, suggesting the presence of potential obstacles, such as religious beliefs and insufficient knowledge about organ donation. Implementing targeted educational campaigns that involve spiritual leaders and provide accurate data about organ donation is crucial. This could improve public awareness and participation. Implementing an opt-out system, wherein individuals are presumed willing to donate unless they explicitly decline, could significantly increase donor rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.