ArticleCureus2024
Optimizing Propranolol Therapy for Infantile Hemangiomas: The Role of the Multidisciplinary Team.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative analysis of growth and developmental outcomes in infants with proliferative hemangiomas treated with oral propranolol versus prednisone.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral propranolol therapy is currently the first choice for infants with infantile hemangiomas (IHs) requiring systemic treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oral propranolol therapy for IHs and to assess the role of a multidisciplinary medical team in supporting optimal treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsClinical data were retrospectively reviewed from medical records in 150 Japanese infants with IH treated with propranolol orally at Toranomon Hospital. Patients with problematic IH, such as tumor-type IH or IH with ulceration, were eligible for inclusion. Treatment was managed by a medical team consisting of pediatricians, dermatologists, pediatric nurses, pharmacists, and nutritionists. Patients' general conditions and vital signs, such as blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and blood sugar, were closely monitored before, one hour, and two hours after drug administration.
resultsClose collaboration among multidisciplinary medical team members allowed for accurate patient evaluation, contributing to the early detection of side effects, even if asymptomatic. When side effects were suspected, pediatricians and dermatologists discussed the need to reduce or discontinue the medication. Of the 150 patients, no one experienced severe side effects. Although five cases (3.3%) were suspected of having mild side effects (i.e., hypotension, n = 3; hypotension and hypoglycemia, n = 1; inspiratory stridor, n = 1), treatment could be continued by adjusting the dosage. One hundred twenty patients have completed the oral propranolol therapy with successful outcomes.
conclusionsThis study provided additional evidence of the safety and effectiveness of oral propranolol therapy in 150 Japanese infants with IH. A well-functioning multidisciplinary medical team is essential for optimal patient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.