ArticleCureus2024
Early Detection of Testicular Sertoli Cell Tumor Through Physical Examination: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testicular tumors represent the most common solid organ malignancy in young and adult males. Sex cord-stromal tumors are the second-largest group of primary testicular cancers, after germ-cell tumors. Sertoli cell (SC) tumors of the testis are relatively rare, accounting for only a small fraction of testicular tumors. Here, we report on a 17-year-old male diagnosed with a testicular tumor, which was identified during a routine physical examination at a military recruitment center. A hard lump was detected on the lower pole of the left testicle. Ultrasonography confirmed a solid lump with lobular borders. A left orchiectomy was performed, with pathology findings consistent with a SC tumor. Imaging showed no evidence of secondary tumor spread. Follow-up did not detect a recurrence of the tumor or any signs of spread. This case strengthens the importance of physical examination of male genitalia, particularly by experienced medical physicians, that may detect testicular tumors and prevent morbidity and mortality. This case study may add to the ongoing debate and inconsistent recommendations on the need for testicular examination in general and, more specifically, testicular self-examination or testicular examination by the physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.