ArticleCureus2024
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Structured Teaching-Learning Module in Improving Knowledge and Skills in Writing Injury Reports Among the Undergraduate Medical Students of a Tertiary Care Center in India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The ability to write accurate and comprehensive injury reports is a crucial skill for medical professionals, particularly those working in emergency medicine and trauma care. A structured teaching-learning (TL) module can enhance the knowledge and skills of undergraduate medical students in this area. Aim The study aims to assess students' performance in cognitive, psychomotor, and communication domains of injury report writing before and after implementing the proposed structured TL module and compare the findings to evaluate the efficacy between the existing TL module and the proposed module. Methods A total of 50 undergraduate Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students of the tertiary care center consented to participate in the study. A total of 41 students participated throughout the entire study duration and were considered for data analysis. The performance of the students was evaluated through assessment and a structured grading description was utilized for distribution of marks. Data were collected, compiled, and analyzed with the help of IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 16 (Released 2007; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results The percentage of students scoring higher than 60% marks in all three domains after the implementation of the proposed module in both immediate post-implementation assessment and two months after post-implementation assessment in comparison to pre-implementation assessment has been found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.01). Conclusion The study observed improvement of performance in all three domains of the competency after implementation of the structured TL module which can be attributed to the introduction of more interactive sessions both in the form of small-group learning and bedside learning in the proposed module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.