Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822386›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

BrainFit: improving executive and subjective cognitive functioning in late-life mood disorders - a double-blind randomized active-controlled study evaluating the effect of online cognitive training.

Mardien L Oudega, Margot J Wagenmakers, Tanya Palsma, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Chris Vriend, Odile A van den Heuvel, Sigfried Schouws, Annemiek Dols

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04006756 (BrainFit), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04006756 nacompletednot on this map

BrainFit: The Effect of Online Cognitive Training in Patients With Late Life Mood Disorders.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2019 to 2021Enrolled38ConditionsDepression, Late Life Mood Disorder, Impaired Cognition, Alteration in MoodArmsOnline cognitive training 1, Online cognitive training 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mardien L OudegaGGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Margot J WagenmakersGGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tanya PalsmaDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Adriaan W HoogendoornDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chris VriendDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Odile A van den HeuvelDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sigfried SchouwsGGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Annemiek DolsDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Unipolar and bipolar mood disorders in older adults are accompanied by cognitive impairment, including executive dysfunction, with a severe impact on daily life. Up and till now, strategies to improve cognitive functioning in late-life mood disorders (LLMD) are sparse. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy of adaptive, computerized cognitive training (CT) on executive and subjective cognitive functioning in LLMD. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled study we enrolled patients over the age of 50 with partly remitted LLMD. Over 8 weeks, patients participated in 24 45-minute sessions of computerized multi-domain training (CT) or an active control condition (ACC) (nonspecific cognitive activity). The primary outcome was executive functioning based on the interference score on the STROOP task (not incorporated in the training). Secondary outcomes were subjective cognitive functioning, depressive symptoms and quality of life. Outcomes were assessed before and after training (T1) and at a 3-month follow-up (T2) and analyzed with linear mixed-model analyses. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included in the study, 22 in the experimental CT and 16 in the ACC. Mean age was 67.3 years and 52.6% was female. Linear mixed-model analyses showed small within-group effect sizes, corresponding to no statistically significant improvement of executive functioning or depression severity in either group. In both groups we did observe an improvement on subjective cognitive functioning over time. From T0 to T1 the mean score of the Cognitive Functioning Questionnaire (CFQ) of the CT group decreased from 52.7 to 46.8 points (p=0.003) and the mean CFQ score of the ACC group decreased from 52.7 to 45.7 points (p<0.001). This effect remained in both groups at follow-up (T2); respectively p=0.002 and p<0.001.The patients in the AAC also showed an improvement of quality of life directly after the training (T1); i.e. the mean quality of life scores improved from 53 to 57 points (p=0.011), but this effect did not remain at follow-up. Conclusions: This study shows no beneficial effect of an 8-week computerized CT on the primary outcome, i.e, executive functioning. Subjective cognitive functioning did improve in both groups, indicating that frequent cognitive training is advantageous. Future studies with more intensive training could be designed to explore this result further. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04006756.

Indexed as

bipolar disordercognitioncognitive impairmentcognitive trainingexecutive functioninglate-life mood disordersolder adultsunipolar depressive disorder

Identifiers

PMID39822386
PMCPMC11735943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.