Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822368›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Survival outcomes, multidimensional prediction and subsequent therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer receiving palbociclib: a real-world analysis.

Jiayi Ma, Ziping Wu, Yaqian Xu, Yaohui Wang, Yanping Lin, Liheng Zhou, Shuguang Xu, Jie Zhang, Wenjin Yin, Jingsong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiayi Ma *Department of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ziping Wu *Department of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yaqian XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yaohui WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanping LinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Liheng ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shuguang XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wenjin YinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jingsong LuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To date, the overall survival (OS) of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with palbociclib has not been reported in Chinese patients. It still remains unclear what kind of patients may benefit in OS from palbociclib treatment and what the optimal sequential antineoplastic regimen is for those progressing on palbociclib. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the OS outcome of ABC patients receiving palbociclib, establish a predictive model to identify the potential candidates who may benefit from palbociclib and explore the ideal subsequent treatment strategy after palbociclib. Methods: This is a single-center ambispective real-world analysis of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive ABC from April 2018 to August 2021. The patients were followed up via telephone or clinic visit. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate and time to second disease progression (PFS2) were evaluated as prognosis outcomes. Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDKI) score was established to predict OS benefit on the basis of tumor burden, line of palbociclib treatment and tumor marker. Results: Fifty patients were included with the median PFS of 9.57 months and the median OS of 33.60 months. Age <65 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.33, P=0.008], lung or liver involvement (HR 3.01, P=0.005) and > first line palbociclib therapy (HR 2.13, P=0.03) were independent unfavorable prognosticators for PFS. Positive estrogen receptor (ER) (HR 0.22, P=0.004), metastatic sites <3 (HR 3.59, P=0.02), absence of lung or liver involvement (HR 3.77, P=0.058) and PFS ≥12 months during palbociclib regimen (HR 0.14, P<0.001) could predict longer OS. CDKI score discriminated OS significantly (HR 4.41, P=0.009) and the CDKI score-based models were multidimensionally verified with satisfying performance, among which the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic reached 0.835 and the C-index was 0.72. Moreover, chemo-free regimens saw improvement in time to second disease progression (HR 0.32, P=0.006) and OS (HR 0.32, P=0.049) for patients progressing on palbociclib compared with chemotherapy-based regimens. Conclusions: CDKI score is a practical and comprehensive tool in predicting OS benefit for ABC patients treated with palbociclib, which deserves further validation. Patients who progressed on palbociclib seem to keep benefiting from chemo-free antineoplastic treatments. These findings may help identify the candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitor and optimize the strategies for hormone receptor-positive ABC.

Indexed as

Advanced breast cancer (ABC)cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor score (CDKI score)hormone receptor-positiveoverall survival (OS)palbociclib

Identifiers

PMID39822368
PMCPMC11733649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.