ArticleGland surgery2024
Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The clinical value and learning curve analysis of the modified areolar approach for endoscopic thyroidectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) offers superior cosmetic outcomes compared to traditional open thyroidectomy but is associated with higher postoperative drainage volumes (DV) and potential complications. Although ET via the areola approach (ETAA) has been used, the factors influencing DV after ETAA remain poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to identify clinical parameters that can objectively evaluate the factors influencing drainage volume after ETAA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with thyroid disease who underwent ETAA at The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University between February and September 2016. After adjusting for potential confounders, univariate and ordinal logistic regression analyses determined the association between DV and clinical variables. Results: We identified hyperthyroidism, operation time, and male gender as independent risk factors for increased DV. Specifically, hyperthyroidism was linked to higher DV across the first and second 24-hour periods [odds ratio (OR) =2.97, P=0.049], while longer operation times and male gender also significantly influenced DV (≤100 min: OR =0.11, P=0.02; >100, ≤150 min: OR =0.39, P=0.049; male gender OR =0.23, P=0.02). Notably, high DV in the second 24 hours predicted even higher DV in the third 24 hours (<30 mL: OR =0.04, P<0.001; 30-60 mL: OR =0.22, P=0.01). These findings suggest that patients with these risk factors should be closely monitored during ETAA, and postponing drain removal in patients with large DV in the early postoperative period may be warranted. Conclusions: This study enhances our understanding of the factors affecting DV after ETAA and highlights the need for tailored postoperative care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.