ArticleGland surgery2024
Application of an artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system for breast ultrasound: a prospective study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of breast cancer is of great importance to improve the prognosis of patients. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnostic system for breast ultrasound is gradually being applied in the identification of benign and malignant breast lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and optimal application of AI Methods: A total of 501 consecutive patients with 679 breast lesions were prospectively included in the study. Junior and senior radiologists were asked to interpret images of lesions with and without AI assistance, respectively. Three application modes of AI were employed: AI alone, adjusted Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS; incorporating BI-RADS obtained by AI into BI-RADS obtained by radiologists), and second reading mode (combining characteristic information extracted by AI to conduct a second reading so as to obtain a new BI-RADS). The diagnostic performances of these application modes were analyzed and compared. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of junior radiologists increased from 0.879 to 0.921 in BI-RADS Conclusions: AI-assisted ultrasound is useful for the diagnosis of breast lesions, particularly for junior radiologists and lesions ≤2 cm. The use of the second reading mode can achieve excellent diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.