ArticleGland surgery2024
Predictive modeling of breast cancer-related lymphedema using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- From raw clinical data to robust prediction: an AI framework for early lymphedema detection.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Nursing-Led Strategies - A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- AI-Empowered Mechanomedicine for Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Identification of chemotherapy-related risk factors for lymphedema in breast cancer patients using Lasso regression and model development.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Constructing an early warning model for elderly sepsis patients based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of Enzalutamide-Related Genes for Prognosis and Immunotherapy in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.Human mutation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the common complications after breast cancer surgery. It can easily lead to limb swelling, deformation and upper limb dysfunction, which has a serious impact on the physical and mental health and quality of life of patients. Previous studies have mostly used statistical methods such as linear regression and logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors, but all of them have certain limitations. Machine learning (ML) is an important branch of artificial intelligence, which can effectively overcome the problems of multivariate interaction and collinearity. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors for the occurrence of BCRL in breast cancer patients, and construct a predictive model with ML algorithms and validate its predictive value on this basis. Methods: Clinical data of breast cancer patients admitted to Hainan Cancer Hospital from September 2018 to May 2024 were retrospectively collected. BCRL was considered as the outcome measurement, and the data were divided into training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were used to construct predictive models. The discrimination accuracy of the models was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The calibration of the models was assessed using calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) Chi-squared test. Results: Two hundred and forty patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened, and they were randomly divided into a training set (168 patients) and a validation set (72 patients) in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, 44 cases developed BCRL, while 124 did not. There were statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in hypertension history, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications, postoperative functional exercises, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and level of axillary lymph node dissection between the BCRL and non-BCRL groups. Among the four models, the XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 in the training set and 0.89 in the validation set. The XGBoost model demonstrated good calibration in both the training and validation sets, showing good consistency with the ideal model. Conclusions: The ML-based XGBoost model for predicting BCRL exhibits excellent performance and assists healthcare professionals in rapidly and accurately assessing the risk of BCRL occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.