Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822356›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Predictive modeling of breast cancer-related lymphedema using machine learning algorithms.

Yang Sun, Xiaomin Xia, Xia Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang SunDepartment of Breast Oncology, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China.
Xiaomin XiaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China.
Xia LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the common complications after breast cancer surgery. It can easily lead to limb swelling, deformation and upper limb dysfunction, which has a serious impact on the physical and mental health and quality of life of patients. Previous studies have mostly used statistical methods such as linear regression and logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors, but all of them have certain limitations. Machine learning (ML) is an important branch of artificial intelligence, which can effectively overcome the problems of multivariate interaction and collinearity. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors for the occurrence of BCRL in breast cancer patients, and construct a predictive model with ML algorithms and validate its predictive value on this basis. Methods: Clinical data of breast cancer patients admitted to Hainan Cancer Hospital from September 2018 to May 2024 were retrospectively collected. BCRL was considered as the outcome measurement, and the data were divided into training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were used to construct predictive models. The discrimination accuracy of the models was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The calibration of the models was assessed using calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) Chi-squared test. Results: Two hundred and forty patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened, and they were randomly divided into a training set (168 patients) and a validation set (72 patients) in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, 44 cases developed BCRL, while 124 did not. There were statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in hypertension history, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative complications, postoperative functional exercises, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and level of axillary lymph node dissection between the BCRL and non-BCRL groups. Among the four models, the XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 in the training set and 0.89 in the validation set. The XGBoost model demonstrated good calibration in both the training and validation sets, showing good consistency with the ideal model. Conclusions: The ML-based XGBoost model for predicting BCRL exhibits excellent performance and assists healthcare professionals in rapidly and accurately assessing the risk of BCRL occurrence.

Indexed as

Breast cancerbreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithms (XGBoost algorithms)machine learning (ML)predictive model

Identifiers

PMID39822356
PMCPMC11733644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.