Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822308›Full record

ArticleNature geoscience2025

Preservation of organic carbon in marine sediments sustained by sorption and transformation processes.

Peyman Babakhani, Andrew W Dale, Clare Woulds, Oliver W Moore, Ke-Qing Xiao, Lisa Curti, Caroline L Peacock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature geoscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peyman BabakhaniSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-4320
Andrew W DaleGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-5997
Clare WouldsSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Oliver W MooreSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2014-0065
Ke-Qing XiaoSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-9340
Lisa CurtiSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-3291
Caroline L PeacockSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-9294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controls on organic carbon preservation in marine sediments remain controversial but crucial for understanding past and future climate dynamics. Here we develop a conceptual-mathematical model to determine the key processes for the preservation of organic carbon. The model considers the major processes involved in the breakdown of organic carbon, including dissolved organic carbon hydrolysis, mixing, remineralization, mineral sorption and molecular transformation. This allows redefining of burial efficiency as preservation efficiency, which considers both particulate organic carbon and mineral-phase organic carbon. We show that preservation efficiency is almost three times higher than the conventionally defined burial efficiency and reconciles predictions with global field data. Kinetic sorption and transformation are the dominant controls on organic carbon preservation. We conclude that a synergistic effect between kinetic sorption and molecular transformation (geopolymerization) creates a mineral shuttle in which mineral-phase organic carbon is protected from remineralization in the surface sediment and released at depth. The results explain why transformed organic carbon persists over long timescales and increases with depth.

Indexed as

Carbon cycleMarine biology

Identifiers

PMID39822308
PMCPMC11732750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.