ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Comprehensive Cellular Senescence Evaluation to Aid Targeted Therapies.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered bacteria reprogram tumor microenvironmentActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Integrin Beta 4 Protein Expression Bimodally Predicts Sensitivity to CDK4/6 Inhibition and Resistance to Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer.The breast journal · 2026Article
- "Dual-Boosting" Strategy to Enhance Radical Generation of Photosensitizer for Mitochondria-Targeted Phototherapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug resistance to a single agent is common in cancer-targeted therapies, and rational drug combinations are a promising approach to overcome this challenge. Many Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs can induce cellular senescence, which possesses unique vulnerabilities and molecular signatures. However, there is limited analysis on the effect of the combination of cellular-senescence-inducing drugs and targeted therapy drugs. Here, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of cellular senescence using 7 senescence-associated gene sets. We quantified the cellular senescence states of ~10,000 tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas and examined their associations with targeted drug responses. Our analysis revealed that tumors with higher cellular senescence scores exhibited increased sensitivity to targeted drugs. As a proof of concept, we experimentally confirmed that etoposide-induced senescence sensitized lung cancer cells to 2 widely used targeted drugs, erlotinib and dasatinib. Furthermore, we identified multiple genes whose dependencies were associated with senescence status across ~1,000 cancer cell lines, suggesting that cellular senescence generates unique vulnerabilities for therapeutic exploitation. Our study provides a comprehensive overview of drug response related to cellular senescence and highlights the potential of combining senescence-inducing agents with targeted therapies to improve treatment outcomes in lung cancer, revealing novel applications of cellular senescence in targeted cancer therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.