ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Frequency and reasons that parents decline genetic testing for critically ill neonates.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators of implementing cardiovascular health assessment in children and adolescents in primary care settings in Malaysia: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Parents' perceptions of the utility of genetic testing in the NICU.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Current literature reports strong support among parents for genetic testing for ill neonates; yet, some parents decline this testing for unknown reasons. We aimed to document the proportion of parents who decline, describe their clinical and demographic characteristics, and categorize their rationales. Methods: We reviewed medical records to collect and compare clinical and demographic information for patients whose parents consented to and declined recommended genetic testing. We also conducted brief interviews with parents who declined testing to discover their rationales. Results: Fifty-one of 247 parents (21%) declined recommended genetic testing. The most common reason for declining, cited by 83% of parents interviewed, was that the testing felt irrelevant to the problems they saw as most important. The second most common reason, cited by 63%, was worrying that the testing might yield unwanted information. Compared with parents who consented, those who declined were more likely to be making the decision for a child with a prenatally diagnosed condition ( Conclusion: Parents who decline genetic testing for ill neonates provide an alternate appraisal of benefits and harms which should be incorporated into informing future parents considering these tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.