Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822254›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Piezo Ion Channels and Their Association With Haptic Technology Use: A Narrative Review.

Jeffrey Gudin, Mark Sakr, Janet Fason, Peter Hurwitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey GudinPain Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Mark SakrSports Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Janet FasonFamily Medicine, Stein Medical, Tyrone, USA.
Peter HurwitzResearch, Clarity Science LLC, Narragansett, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent identification of Piezo ion channels demonstrating a mechano-sensitive impact on neurons revealed distinct Piezo-1 and 2 types. While Piezo-1 predominates in neurons linked to non-sensory stimulation, such as pressure in blood vessels, Piezo-2 predominates in neurons linked to sensory stimulation, such as touch. Piezo-1 and 2 have a major bidirectional impact on transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels, and TRPs also impact neurotransmitter release. Particularly existent in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, which are located in nerve endings, Piezo-2 is a key DRG activator. Subsequent Piezo findings have been vital to recent medical haptic technology developments, in tandem with breakthroughs in the emerging neurology subfield of

Indexed as

all neurologyconnectomicshaptic exposurehaptic vibrotactile trigger technologyion channelsmulti-modality pain managementpiezosensory perceptiontactile perception

Identifiers

PMID39822254
PMCPMC11735230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.