Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822242›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2025

Prior Information Shapes Perceptual Confidence.

Luca Tarasi, Margherita Covelli, Chiara Tabarelli de Fatis, Vincenzo Romei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prior Expectations Bias Confidence Judgments Through Parietal Alpha-Band Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca TarasiDipartimento di Psicologia, Universitàdi Bologna and Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Universitàdi Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-3173
Margherita CovelliDipartimento di Psicologia, Universitàdi Bologna and Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Universitàdi Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5890-9114
Chiara Tabarelli de FatisDipartimento di Psicologia, Universitàdi Bologna and Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Universitàdi Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1586-2233
Vincenzo RomeiDipartimento di Psicologia, Universitàdi Bologna and Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Universitàdi Bologna, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-2316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisional confidence refers to the subjective evaluation of the accuracy of a decision based on sensory information. While these judgments are typically grounded in the strength of evidence leading to a decision, they are also subjected to influence from top-down factors such as prior expectations. Previous research has highlighted the impact of prior information on decision parameters such as reaction times and decision criteria placement. However, a comprehensive understanding of how prior information shapes confidence ratings is still lacking. In this study, we manipulate prior knowledge by inducing varying levels of target probability expectation (low: 33%, random: 50%, high: 67%) in a perceptual detection task. In each trial both type-1 (detection) and type-2 (confidence) responses were recorded. First, we replicate previous findings, demonstrating that decisional priors impact decision criteria but not task sensitivity. Secondly, we reveal the strong effect that prior expectations exert on type-2 decisions, with this influence being moderated by a congruency effect between the given prior, the actual stimulus presented, and the provided response. Moreover, we find that confidence is higher in correct compared to incorrect responses, with low-probability trials leading to higher confidence judgments in correct choices compared to random and liberal trials. Finally, we unveil that prior-dependent modulation rates in criterion and confidence were positively associated. These results underscore the intricate interplay between prior expectations, decision-making, and confidence levels, demonstrating that what we perceive is not solely a data-driven phenomenon but can be already shaped by the available information about the state of the world.

Indexed as

MetacognitionPerceptual ConfidencePerceptual decision-makingPredictive codingSignal Detection Theory

Identifiers

PMID39822242
PMCPMC11736391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.