Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822235›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Growth of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly and the role of for-profit programs.

Katherine E M Miller, Ravi Gupta, Daniel Polsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine E M MillerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21025, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-2369
Ravi GuptaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21025, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-6414
Daniel PolskyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21025, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a managed care program financed by capitated government payments that primarily serves adults aged 55 or older requiring nursing home level of care who are dual-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. While PACE programs have historically been nonprofit entities, in 2016, a regulation change allowed for-profit PACE programs to help expand the program. We describe PACE program growth from 2010 to 2022. Both the number of PACE programs and enrollees grew from 2010 to 2022. Yet, after allowing for-profits to enter the market, the enrollment rate of growth slowed overall (13.4% vs 7.0%), though for-profit program enrollment grew more rapidly compared to nonprofit programs (13.2% vs 5.7%). Entry of new programs drove for-profit growth primarily. Despite the growth of for-profit programs, most enrollees continued to receive care from nonprofit programs (78%) by 2022. Allowing for-profit programs did not increase PACE enrollment rates overall. Given emerging evidence that for-profit ownership in other health care sectors may reduce quality compared to nonprofits, policymakers should carefully monitor care quality and patient outcomes in PACE as for-profit entities increase.

Indexed as

frail elderlylong-term caremanaged careMedicaidownershipPACEprivatization

Identifiers

PMID39822235
PMCPMC11736723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.