ArticleATS scholar2024
A Practical Guide to Identifying a Supportive Work Environment for Underrepresented Faculty in Academic Medicine.
Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Much has been added to the literature to better characterize and define the experiences of faculty who are underrepresented in medicine and other health professions. Additions include approaches for faculty development and suggestions for institutions on how to create equitable environments that promote the success and advancement of this group. Despite all these additions to the literature, health professions educators still lack practical approaches to determine supportive academic health center environments that are receptive to their needs and resourced to promote their career success. To the authors' knowledge, there has not been a paper that uses a validated framework and practical approach to advise underrepresented faculty in the health professions on how to evaluate an academic health system. Adapting criteria used to determine the rigor of qualitative research, the authors propose such an evaluative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.