Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822222›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2024

Moving toward Interprofessional Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed Methods Study.

Aahd Kubbara, Jennifer Wong, Katie Capp, Selam Woldegerima, Michael A Sundberg, Andrew P J Olson, Kathryn Pendleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aahd KubbaraDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and.ORCID 0000-0002-5906-1719
Jennifer WongDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and.
Katie CappDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; and.
Selam WoldegerimaDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael A SundbergDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Andrew P J OlsonDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kathryn PendletonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is an evolving focus on interprofessional education (IPE) to promote teamwork and collaboration in health professions education. Studies in medical students have shown that exposure to IPE leads to perceived improvements in interprofessional communication, effective work in healthcare teams, and understanding of professional limitations. Most research focuses on IPE in undergraduate medical education; less is known about how this functions in graduate medical education. Objective: To develop and implement a lecture-based intensive care unit (ICU) educational curriculum, incorporating content delivery by interprofessional team members (IPMs), and to use a mixed methods approach to explore learner and IPM perceptions surrounding the benefits and opportunities with this model of education. Methods: A standardized curriculum of core topics in critical care medicine was designed and implemented as a recurring interactive lecture series over the course of a medical ICU rotation at an academic hospital. The lectures were delivered by pulmonary and critical care attendings or fellows and IPMs, including pharmacists, dietitians, advanced practice providers, and physical therapists. Internal medicine residents' perceptions of faculty engagement in teaching, involvement in interprofessional care teams, and educational value of the rotation were analyzed quantitatively before and after intervention. Semistructured focus groups with residents and IPMs were held after implementation to explore the experience, motivations, and effectiveness of IPMs as educators. Themes were identified using a deductive approach, with coding by multiple team members. Results: Before lecture series implementation, 57 residents completed end-of-rotation evaluations. The average score for perceived faculty engagement and interest in teaching was 4.16 out of 5 (standard deviation [SD], 1.05). Forty-five residents completed evaluations after implementation, and the perception of faculty interest in teaching was not statistically different at 4.20 (SD, 0.92; Conclusion: Teaching by IPMs can be integrated into a lecture-based curriculum in an academic ICU. After implementation, residents identified that engagement of IPMs as teachers may lead to improved understanding of roles and responsibilities and mutual respect. IPMs cite sharing of specialized knowledge and return on investment as motivations for teaching.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsCritical CareCurriculumHumansInternship and ResidencyPatient Care TeamTeachingcritical carecurriculuminterprofessional educationthemes

Identifiers

PMID39822222
PMCPMC11734683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.