ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024
Assessing the Effect of Fatigue on Swallowing Function in Adults with Acute Stroke. A Pilot Study.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Swallowing trajectories and influencing factors among subacute stroke patients with dysphagia in rehabilitation wards: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine if fatigue systematically effects the timing of swallowing events and to discuss underlying causes of fatigue other than peripheral neuromuscular fatigue. Design: Pre-post within-subject repeated-measures design. Setting: General acute care hospital and designated stroke center. Participants: Thirteen patients (10 males and 3 females) aged 52-80 years (mean 64.84±9.58 y) with acute stroke and clinically suspected dysphagia. Interventions: Under videofluoroscopy, each participant swallowed a pre- and post-study 1-mL liquid barium bolus and, in an attempt to fatigue the system, 30-45 additional bolus trials of varying amounts (ie, 5 mL, 10 mL, and bite-sized) and consistencies (ie, International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Level 0-7). Main Outcome Measures: Six temporal sequences (ie, oral, pharyngeal, and pharyngeal delay transit times and durations of laryngeal vestibule closure, cricopharyngeal opening, and laryngeal elevation) for 1-mL liquid boluses were measured pre- and postvideofluoroscopic swallowing study and compared. Results: Findings indicated that only 2 of the 6 temporal factors yielded significant differences pre- to post fatigue. The postvideofluoroscopic 1-mL liquid swallow took longer than the pre-videofluoroscopic 1-mL liquid swallow in terms of pharyngeal transit ( Conclusions: These findings indicate that peripheral neuromuscular fatigue is unlikely to be the primary cause of the observed changes, as only 2 of the 6 temporal measures-pharyngeal transit time and pharyngeal delay time-were affected. In cases of peripheral neuromuscular fatigue, one would expect increases across all 6 timing measures due to the integrated nature of the swallowing process. Instead, the results suggest that the inconsistencies may stem from a delayed excitatory response of neurons or a delay in synaptic transmission within the nucleus tractus solitarius, potentially associated with stroke. This delay likely contributes to the prolongation of both pharyngeal transit and pharyngeal delay times. Thus, a model focused solely on peripheral neuromuscular fatigue does not fully account for the findings, highlighting the importance of considering central neural mechanisms in the clinical evaluation of swallowing disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.