Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822186›Full record

ArticleHydrobiologia2022

Nutritional effects of invasive macrophyte detritus on

Daniel J Desautels, Yebin Wang, Asher Ripp, Amber Beaman, Sena Andea, Rachel B Hartman, David J Civitello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hydrobiologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Experimental water hyacinth invasion and destructive management increase human schistosome transmission potential.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel J DesautelsDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
Yebin WangDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
Asher RippDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
Amber BeamanDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
Sena AndeaDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
Rachel B HartmanDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.
David J CivitelloDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA 30322.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-6288

Funding

Resource competition drives natural and rebound dynamics of snails and schistosomesR01AI150774 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CIVITELLO, DAVID JAMES · 2020 to 2025
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosomes are parasitic flatworms that cycle between humans and freshwater snails, infecting more than 200 million humans. Many schistosome-endemic sites are invaded by non-native plants that snails cannot consume. Inedible plants could suppress snail growth, reproduction, and schistosome production by outcompeting edible resources. Alternatively, their decomposition could create edible detritus that fuels snail growth, reproduction, or schistosome production. We evaluated the nutritional effects of detritus from four widespread invasive plants on human schistosomes,

Indexed as

food qualityinfectionintermediate hostinvasive plantsResource ecologyschistosomes

Identifiers

PMID39822186
PMCPMC11737597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.