Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822172›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2025

Conversion Therapy for Stage IV Gastric Cancer: Report From the Expert Consensus Meeting at KINGCA WEEK 2024.

Tae-Han Kim, Ichiro Uyama, Sun Young Rha, Maria Bencivenga, Jiyeong An, Lucjan Wyrwicz, Dong-Hoe Koo, Richard van Hillegersberg, Keun-Wook Lee, Guoxin Li and 7 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery following chemotherapy for cStage IVb gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tae-Han KimDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-7208
Ichiro UyamaDepartment of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1044-2948
Sun Young RhaYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-4531
Maria BencivengaGeneral and Upper GI Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1338-6160
Jiyeong AnDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-4947
Lucjan WyrwiczDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Cancer Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-6892
Dong-Hoe KooDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-8883
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-261X
Keun-Wook LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8491-703X
Guoxin LiCancer Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Takaki YoshikawaGastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-9484
Brian BadgwellDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-8355
Sylvie LorenzenDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7933-2507
In-Ho KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0351-2074
In-Seob LeeDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3099-0140
Hye-Sook HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea. hyesukhan@chungbuk.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-8700
Hur HoonDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea. hhcmc75@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-5363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion therapy is a treatment strategy that shifts from palliative systemic therapy to curative surgical treatment for primary and/or metastatic stage IV gastric cancer (GC). To address its clinical statements, the Korean Gastric Cancer Association aims to present a consensus on conversion therapy among experts attending KINGCA WEEK 2024. The KINGCA Scientific Committee and Development Working Group for Korean Practice Guidelines prepared preformulated topics and 9 clinical statements for conversion therapy. The Delphi method was applied to a panel of 17 experts for consensus and opinions. The final comments were announced after the statement presentation and discussed during the consensus meeting session of KINGCA WEEK 2024. Most experts agreed that conversion therapy provides a survival benefit for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and undergo R0 resection (88.3%). Patients with limited metastases were considered good candidates (94.2%). The optimal timing was based on the response to systemic therapy (70.6%). The regimen was recommended to be individualized (100%) and the duration to be at least 6 months (88.3%). A minimally invasive approach (82.3%) and D2 lymph node dissection (82.4%) were considered for surgery. However, resection for metastases with a complete clinical response after systemic therapy was not advocated (41.2%). All experts agreed on the need for large-scale randomized-controlled trials for further evidence (100%). Recent advancements in treatment may facilitate radical surgery for patients with stage IV GC. Further evidence is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of conversion therapy.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingChemotherapyGastric cancerMetastasisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39822172
PMCPMC11739646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.