GuidelineJournal of gastric cancer2025
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline).
Guideline in Journal of gastric cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07161479 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blinded Trial Comparing Argon Plasma Coagulation and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Gastric Adenoma With Low-Grade Dysplasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blinded Trial Comparing Argon Plasma Coagulation and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Gastric Adenoma With Low-Grade Dysplasia
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comprehensive Computed Tomography Evaluation of Gastric Cancer: 2026 Consensus Recommendation From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Guideline
- Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcome and long-term survival.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology task force recommendations on surveillance forGut · 2026Guideline
- Clinical Outcomes According to Surgical Strategies in Proximal Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Improvement in Quality of Life After Early Interactive Human Coaching via a Mobile App in Postgastrectomy Patients With Gastric Cancer: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Factors associated with psychological distress among newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer: A cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Complexity and heterogeneity of vascular anatomy in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Associations of Multiple Serum Tumor Markers with Radiological Response and Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving First-Line Palliative Systemic Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Gastric Mucosa Cancer Risk: The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment Staging System.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes Following Open Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of Textbook Outcome in Gastric Surgery (TOGS) for Primary Gastric Cancer in an Eastern High-Volume Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The Full Scope: Standardization of the Use of Endoscopy for Earlier Diagnosis of Stomach Cancer in the USA.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on short-term surgical outcome after radical gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study based on the Korean Gastric Cancer Association nationwide survey.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Stage-Dependent Prognostic Impact of Younger Age in Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
- Tackling similarities and differences in global practice guidelines for gastric cancer: a review on the latest Taiwan guidelines with Asia-Pacific, European and US guidelines.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Review
- Simple clinical parameters to identify sarcopenia 1 year after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Older Adult Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Resections: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
- OLGA and OLGIM Stages for Predicting Metachronous Gastric Neoplasm After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer Without a CurrentJournal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
- Agreement, Compliance, and Practice Change of the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: A Nationwide Multidisciplinary Survey.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
- Real-World Evidence for Expanding the Criteria for Endoscopic Resection in Submucosal Gastric Cancer: The Role of Invasion Width.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.