ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2025
Reproducibility of extracellular vesicle research.
Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for extracellular vesicles enables diagnostic and therapeutic nanobiotechnology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Engineering inertial flow patterns for signal amplification in disc-based protein assays.Theranostics · 2026Article
- How Laboratory Guidelines Promote the Validity of Circulating Extracellular Vesicle-Associated Nucleic Acid Biomarker Signatures in Liquid Biopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Recommendations for Studying In Situ Extracellular Vesicles From Solid Tissue.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
- From Bench to Brain: Translating EV and Nanocarrier Research into Parkinson's Disease Therapies.Biology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in engineered exosome-based therapies for ocular vascular disease.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Next-generation materials for nucleic acid delivery.Nature reviews. Materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.