Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822124›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2025

Multiple, Single Trait GWAS and Supervised Machine Learning Reveal the Genetic Architecture of Fraxinus excelsior Tolerance to Ash Dieback in Europe.

James M Doonan, Katharina B Budde, Chatchai Kosawang, Albin Lobo, Rita Verbylaite, Jaelle C Brealey, Michael D Martin, Alfas Pliura, Kristina Thomas, Heino Konrad and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genome-wide and co-expression network dissection ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of Thermal Plasticity inEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

James M DoonanDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-5808
Katharina B BuddeNorthwest German Forest Research Institute, Hann. Münden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-2815
Chatchai KosawangDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-4454
Albin LoboDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9580-2860
Rita VerbylaiteKaunas Forestry and Environmental Engineering University of Applied Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0587-1599
Jaelle C BrealeyDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-2017
Michael D MartinDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-5139
Alfas PliuraLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-1359
Kristina ThomasZentralstelle der Forstverwaltung, Forschungsanstalt für Waldökologie und Forstwirtschaft, Hauptstraße 16, Trippstadt, Germany.
Heino KonradInstitute for Forest Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, Federal Research and Training Center for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-9550
Stefan SeegmüllerZentralstelle der Forstverwaltung, Forschungsanstalt für Waldökologie und Forstwirtschaft, Hauptstraße 16, Trippstadt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7654-308X
Mateusz LiziniewiczSkogforsk, Ekebo 2250, Svalöv, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-9511
Michelle ClearySouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-5974
Miguel Nemesio-GorrizForest Development Department, Teagasc, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-8101
Barbara FussiBavarian Office for Forest Genetics (AWG), Teisendorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-3935
Thomas KirisitsInstitute of Forest Entomology, Forest Pathology and Forest Protection, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9918-3593
M Thomas P GilbertDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-7195
Myriam HeuertzBIOGECO, INRAE, University of Bordeaux, Cestas, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-3645
Erik Dahl KjærDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-1611
Lene Rostgaard NielsenDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-8691

Funding

This research was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF|Technology and Production Sciences) under the grant no. 8022-00355B. Field work in Austria was supported by BML DaFNE grant no. 101476 ("Esche in Not-Phase II") funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions and Water Management, the Austrian Chamber of Agriculture, the governments of all Austrian provinces, the Forest Office and Urban Agriculture (MA 49) of the Vienna City Administration and "Österreichischer Forstverein"; as well as by BML DaFNE grant no. 101684 ("Waldfonds" project "AshBack") funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions and Water Management. The establishment of the German trial site "Chiemsee" was supported by the Bavarian Ministry under the projects KLIP1 and ST272. J.C.B. was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Action grant 8177291009 "HoloFood".
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) is under intensive attack from the invasive alien pathogenic fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, causing ash dieback at epidemic levels throughout Europe. Previous studies have found significant genetic variation among genotypes in ash dieback susceptibility and that host phenology, such as autumn yellowing, is correlated with susceptibility of ash trees to H. fraxineus; however, the genomic basis of ash dieback tolerance in F. excelsior requires further investigation. Here, we integrate quantitative genetics based on multiple replicates and genome-wide association analyses with machine learning to reveal the genetic architecture of ash dieback tolerance and of phenological traits in F. excelsior populations in six European countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Lithuania, Sweden). Based on phenotypic data of 486 F. excelsior replicated genotypes we observed negative genotypic correlations between crown damage caused by ash dieback and intensity of autumn leaf yellowing within multiple sampling sites. Our results suggest that the examined traits are polygenic and using genomic prediction models, with ranked single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on GWAS associations as input, a large proportion of the variation was predicted by unlinked SNPs. Based on 100 unlinked SNPs, we can predict 55% of the variation in disease tolerance among genotypes (as phenotyped in genetic trials), increasing to a maximum of 63% when predicted from 9155 SNPs. In autumn leaf yellowing, 52% of variation is predicted by 100 unlinked SNPs, reaching a peak of 72% using 3740 SNPs. Based on feature permutations within genomic prediction models, a total of eight nonsynonymous SNPs linked to ash dieback crown damage and autumn leaf yellowing (three and five SNPs, respectively) were identified, these were located within genes related to plant defence (pattern triggered immunity, pathogen detection) and phenology (regulation of flowering and seed maturation, auxin transport). We did not find an overlap between genes associated with crown damage level and autumn leaf yellowing. Hence, our results shed light on the difference in the genomic basis of ADB tolerance and autumn leaf yellowing despite these two traits being correlated in quantitative genetic analysis. Overall, our methods show the applicability of genomic prediction models when combined with GWAS to reveal the genomic architecture of polygenic disease tolerance enabling the identification of ash dieback tolerant trees for breeding or conservation purposes.

Indexed as

AscomycotaFraxinusGenome-Wide Association StudyMachine LearningPlant DiseasesDisease ResistanceEuropeGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotideash diebackcommon ashdiseaseGWASHymenoscyphus fraxineusinvasive alien pathogenmachine learningphenologySNPstolerance

Identifiers

PMID39822124
PMCPMC11963480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.