ArticleAnnals of neurology2025
Clinical Relevance of 'Cap' and 'Track' Development after Recent Small Subcortical Infarct.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote cortical degeneration related to structural connectivity following recent small subcortical infarcts.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Regional Hypoperfusion Predicts White Matter Tract Degeneration in Recent Single Subcortical Infarcts.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAfter a recent small subcortical infarct (RSSI), some patients develop perilesional or remote hyperintensities ('caps/tracks') to the index infarct on T2/FLAIR MRI. However, their clinical relevance remains unclear. We investigated the clinicoradiological correlates of 'caps/tracks', and their impact on long-term outcomes following RSSI.
methodsWe identified participants with lacunar stroke and MRI-confirmed RSSI from 3 prospective studies. At baseline, we collected risk factors, RSSI characteristics, small vessel disease (SVD) features, and microstructural integrity on diffusion imaging. Over 1-year, we repeated MRI and recorded 'caps/tracks' blinded to other data. We evaluated predictors of 'caps/tracks', and their association with 1-year functional (modified Rankin Scale score ≥2), mobility (Timed Up-and-Go), cognitive outcomes (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score <26), and recurrent cerebrovascular events (stroke/transient ischemic attack/incident infarct) using multivariable regression.
resultsAmong 185 participants, 93 (50.3%) developed 'caps/tracks' first detected at median 198 days after stroke. 'Caps/tracks' were independently predicted by baseline factors: larger RSSI, RSSI located in white matter, higher SVD score, and higher mean diffusivity in normal-appearing white matter (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}], 1.15 [1.07-1.25], 6.01 [2.80-13.57], 1.77 [1.31-2.44], 1.42 [1.01-2.03]). At 1 year, 'cap/track' formation was associated with worse functional outcome (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.28-8.22), slower gait speed (β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.01-0.25), and recurrent cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.05-4.02), but not with cognitive impairment.
interpretation'Caps/tracks' after RSSI are associated with worse clinical outcomes, and may reflect vulnerability to progressive SVD-related injury. Reducing 'caps/tracks' may offer early efficacy markers in trials aiming to improve outcome after lacunar stroke. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:942-955.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.