Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821882›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2025

Adverse drug reactions and events in an Ageing PopulaTion risk Prediction (ADAPTiP) tool: the development and validation of a model for predicting adverse drug reactions and events in older patients.

Juliane Frydenlund, Nicole Cosgrave, Frank Moriarty, Emma Wallace, Ciara Kirke, David J Williams, Kathleen Bennett, Caitriona Cahir

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliane FrydenlundData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Lower Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. julianefrydenlund@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-1577
Nicole CosgraveData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Lower Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Frank MoriartySchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Emma WallaceDepartment of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ciara KirkeNational Quality and Patient Safety Directorate at Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
David J WilliamsDepartment of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Kathleen BennettData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Lower Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Caitriona CahirData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Lower Mercer Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board RL-15-1579Health Research Board SDAP-2021-020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlder people are at an increased risk of developing adverse drug reactions (ADR) and adverse drug events (ADE). This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model (ADAPTiP) for ADR/ADE in older populations.

methodsWe used the adverse drug reactions in an Ageing PopulaTion (ADAPT) cohort (N = 798; 361 ADR-related admissions; 437 non-ADR-related admissions), a cross-sectional study designed to examine the prevalence and risk factors for ADR-related hospital admissions in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Twenty predictors (categorised as sociodemographic-related, functional ability-related, disease-related, and medication-related) were considered in the development of the model. The model was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated by fivefold cross-validation. The model was externally validated in a separate prospective cohort from the Centre for Primary Care Research (CPCR) study of ADES. The cross-validated and externally validated model performance was evaluated by discrimination and calibration.

resultsThe final prediction model, ADAPTiP, included nine predictors: age, chronic lung disease, the primary presenting complaints of respiratory, bleeding and gastrointestinal disorders and syncope on hospital admission and antithrombotics, diuretics, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system drug classes. ADAPTiP demonstrated good performance with cross-validated area under the curve of 0.75 [95% CI 0.72;79] and 0.83 [95% CI 0.80;0.87] in the external validation.

conclusionUsing accessible information from medical records, ADAPTiP can help clinicians to identify those older people at risk of an ADR/ADE who should be monitored and/or have their medications reviewed to avoid potentially harmful prescribing.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdverse drug event (ADE)Adverse drug reaction (ADR)High-risk prescribingOlder populationsRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39821882
PMCPMC12014759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.