Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821863›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Utility of 3D facial reconstruction for forensic identification: a focus on facial soft tissue thickness and customized techniques.

Thawanthorn Chaimongkhol, Pagorn Navic, Apichat Sinthubua, Patison Palee, Nuttaya Pattamapaspong, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Arnon Charuakkra, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thawanthorn ChaimongkholPh.D. Program in Anatomy, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pagorn NavicDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Apichat SinthubuaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Patison PaleeFaculty of College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nuttaya PattamapaspongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sukon PrasitwattanasereeDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Arnon CharuakkraDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pasuk MahakkanukrauhDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. pasuk034@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-7552

Funding

Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Chiang Mai University Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Chiang Mai UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University 122/2565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial reconstruction, a crucial method in forensic identification, finds particular significance in cases where conventional means of identification are unavailable. This study addresses a significant gap in the field of forensic facial reconstruction focusing on facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT) and facial reconstruction techniques specifically tailored to the Thai population. By developing and implementing the 3D (three-dimensional) facial reconstruction program and compiling an extensive dataset of FSTT, this research makes substantial progress in advancing forensic facial reconstruction methodologies employing the combination Manchester Method, 3D skull images obtained through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were reconstructed using Autodesk Maya software. A dataset comprising 100 Thai cadavers underwent FSTT measurements via ultrasound (US) for 53 landmarks, with subsequent facial comparisons of 10 samples between reconstructed faces and real photographs conducted using the facial pool comparison and the structural similarity index (SSIM). The accuracy of facial pool comparison ranged from 30 to 80%, reflecting a wide range due to human errors. Thus, incorporating computerized assessment is necessary to minimize human bias. SSIM values ranged from 0.76 to 0.89, indicating strong similarity between reconstructed and real faces and validating the reconstruction process's accuracy. These findings suggest that the facial soft tissue thickness database of the Thai population used in this study can effectively support 3D computerized facial reconstruction. Moreover, this study sets the stage for future advancements in facial reconstruction methodologies tailored to diverse populations, emphasizing the ongoing need for comprehensive data gathering and technique refinement to enhance accuracy and applicability in forensic investigations.

Indexed as

FaceImaging, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnatomic LandmarksCadaverCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotographySoftwareThailand3D facial reconstructionFacial soft tissue thicknessForensic facial reconstructionForensic identification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.