ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Evaluation of sectional anatomic, micro-computed tomographic, and magnetic resonance imaging features of the thorax in Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus).
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Head of the Syrian Hamster (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Assessment of Renal Measurements and Position in the Syrian Hamster (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Clinical Feasibility Studies and Potential Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Integrated in Multimodality X-Ray System for Small Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Major Salivary Gland Examinations of the Donkey (Equus asinus) Using Sectional Anatomy, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Sectional Anatomy with Micro-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlation of the Middle and Caudal Abdominal Regions in the Syrian Hamster (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinically, the rodent thorax is important because of the variety of problems that may affect the heart, lungs, and other thoracic structures. Syrian hamsters are the most common pet and experimental hamster species. Sectional imaging of small mammals is widely increasing in use for clinical and research settings; however, no reports on the thoracic sectional imaging anatomy in this species have been made. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating micro-computed tomography (MCT), magnetic resonance image (MRI), and gross sections of the Syrian hamster thorax. Eight healthy adult male and female Syrian hamsters were examined. Anesthetized hamsters were evaluated by MCT and 3 Tesla MRI. After imaging, the frozen slab sections were photographed, and identified anatomic structures were matched with structures on corresponding MCT and/or MRI images. Clinically relevant anatomic features of the Syrian hamster thorax that were identified on transverse and sagittal anatomic sections could be discerned on the corresponding MCT and MRI scans. The three matched images were exhibited the following features: (1) the narrow thoracic cavity and small lung space, (2) the heart positioning ventral and medial to lung, (3) heart ventricles locating towards the left side, and (4) parallel cardiac position relative to the sternum. The obtained results were similar to those have only been reported in rabbits, regardless of heart orientation and lung lobe covering the heart. The results of this study support the use of MCT and MRI as diagnostic tools in Syrian hamsters and provide reference values for the clinically relevant anatomic structures of thorax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.