Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821840›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2025

Management of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI): A Systematic Literature Review to Assess the Feasibility of Indirect Treatment Comparison (ITC).

Johanna Eliasson Vinterberg, Julia Oddsdottir, Maria Nye, Philippe Pinton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Eliasson VinterbergGlobal Research and Medical, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kastrup, Denmark.
Julia OddsdottirEMEA RW Methods and Evidence Generation, IQVIA, London, UK.
Maria NyeEMEA RW Methods and Evidence Generation, IQVIA, Athens, Greece.
Philippe PintonGlobal Research and Medical, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Kastrup, Denmark. philippe.pinton@ferring.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4227-7687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fecal-microbiota-based therapies are recommended for rCDI on completion of standard-of-care (SoC) antibiotics to prevent further recurrence: these therapies include conventional fecal-microbiota transplantation and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies REBYOTA® (RBL) and VOWST Oral Spores™ (VOS). As an alternative to microbiota-based therapies, bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody, is used as adjuvant to SoC antibiotics to prevent rCDI. There are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing different microbiota-based therapies or bezlotoxumab for rCDI. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials on rCDI treatments and assess the feasibility of using them to conduct an indirect treatment comparison (ITC). The feasibility analysis determined that trial heterogeneity, particularly relating to inclusion criteria, may significantly compromise ITC and prevent cross-trial comparisons. Our analysis underlines the need to adopt standardized protocols to ensure comparability across trials.

Indexed as

EfficacyIndirect treatment comparisonMicrobiota-based therapiesRecurrent Clostridioides difficile infectionSafetySystematic literature search

Identifiers

PMID39821840
PMCPMC11829878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.