ArticleThe ultrasound journal2025
A novel "lateral approach short axis in-plane" technique vs. conventional "short-axis out-of-plane approach" for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access: a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) is a frequent procedure in critically ill patients. According to the guidelines, real-time ultrasound navigation is recommended. Traditional techniques pose several disadvantages, such as suboptimal needle visualization. Therefore, this non-inferiority trial aimed to describe the novel approach and compare the novel lateral in-plane short-axis approach for IJV access with the conventional short-axis out-of-plane approach.
objectivesThe primary objective of the trial was to prove that the first attempt success rate in the novel technique is non-inferior to the conventional technique. The secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the complication rate and the functional duration of the catheter in the novel technique are not inferior to those in the conventional technique.
methodsPatients eligible for IJV cannulation were randomly assigned to either the novel technique (Group A) or the conventional one (Group B). The procedure duration, success rate and the number of attempts required were documented. The functionality of the catheter and complications were monitored from insertion until the catheter removal. Standard descriptive statistical methods were employed for the analysis.
resultsA total of 200 subjects were equally divided between Group A and Group B. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in first attempt success rate (Group A: 79, Group B: 77, p = 0.434). Secondary outcomes, including complications and catheter functional time, did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the novel technique demonstrated a significantly faster procedure time (Group A: 315 s, Group B: 330 s, p = 0.016). Notably, the novel approach was linked with significantly larger IJV diameter measured during the procedure (Group A: 18.2 mm, Group B: 12.1 mm, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe novel lateral in-plane short-axis approach for IJV cannulation is a non-inferior alternative with a lower incidence of posterior vessel wall puncture compared to the conventional approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.