Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821758›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2025

Role of Population Based Studies in Advancing our Knowledge of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Diego A Adrianzen-Herrera, Aneta Strumlowska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diego A Adrianzen-HerreraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA. dadrianz@med.uvm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-2165
Aneta StrumlowskaDepartment of Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by high molecular and genomic heterogeneity. Accordingly, efforts in risk assessment and therapeutic intervention mostly target unique profiles that individualize specific MDS subtypes. In this review, we explored the contributions of population based studies accounting for MDS as a group. RECENT

findingsLarge population based studies have been critical to define important details of our current knowledge of the disease. We summarized the most important population research contributions in MDS, focusing on its epidemiology, population risk factors, and relevant clinical associations. We discuss how these population data can provide vital insights to inform prevention measures, testing strategies, and treatment decisions. Population studies play an important role in guiding clinical and research efforts in MDS. Despite its complex molecular and genomic landscape, population data is integral to define the burden of disease, identify risk factors and clinical associations, and can help elucidate pathogenic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesHumansRisk FactorsEpidemiologyMyelodysplastic syndromePopulation studyRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.