ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2026
The Relationship between Various Measures of Perinatal Quality.
Article in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the correlations between pairs of maternal, infant, and maternal-infant dyad quality measures to provide a comprehensive assessment of perinatal care.In a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificates linked to hospital discharge data from Michigan, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina (2016-2018), we examined correlations between pairs of maternal, infant, and maternal-infant dyad quality measures. Maternal quality measures included nulliparous term singleton vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), and a composite maternal outcome. Infant quality was assessed with a composite outcome measure, whereas the dyad measure combined maternal and infant outcomes.Among 955,904 dyads across 266 hospitals, 25.9% had NTSV, 0.7% had nontransfusion SMM, 12.3% had the composite infant measure, and 19.3% had the dyad measure. The correlation between nontransfusion SMM and the dyad measure was 0.12, whereas the correlation between the composite infant measure and the dyad measure was 0.86, which was higher than the correlation between the composite maternal measure and the dyad measure (0.47).We observed minimal correlations among these perinatal quality measures, especially when aggregated beyond individual outcomes. · There are minimal correlations among different perinatal quality measures.. · Quality is multifaceted, and hospitals vary in the level of quality they achieve.. · Assessing hospital care for pregnant patients and infants requires multiple quality measures..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.