ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Obstructive sleep apnea in bariatric surgery patients: a population-based study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA high proportion of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains undiagnosed. The main objectives of this study were to measure the prevalence of diagnosed OSA and determine OSA predictors in patients who underwent bariatric surgery, who are predominantly female and pre-menopausal and represent an understudied population in OSA literature.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional population-based study using the Ontario Bariatric Registry (OBR) from 2010 to 2016, linked to ICES databases which include health administrative data on all encounters within a single public-payer system. Multiple logistic regression was used to measure OSA predictors.
resultsOut of a total of 18,074 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, OSA was diagnosed in 47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46 to 47), and OSA was the second most common comorbidity within this population. Only 63% of OSA diagnoses were recorded in the OBR at the time of initial bariatric consultation. Based on interaction, it was found that, in females, OSA predictors included social inequality, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in addition to the predictors measured in males (age, body mass index and comorbidity burden).
conclusionA significant proportion of patients presenting for initial bariatric surgery consultation have undiagnosed OSA. OSA screening and testing may lead to underdiagnosis of OSA, especially in pre-menopausal females who represent the majority of the population undergoing bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.