ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Improving timing resolution of BGO for TOF-PET: a comparative analysis with and without deep learning.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Speed Detection of X-ray Pulses Using a Digital Counter Coupled with Perovskite Composite Scintillators.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Multi-Input Interaction Positioning and Signal Demultiplexing With Deep Learning in Semi-Monolithic Detectors.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring spatiotemporal information in a Cherenkov and scintillation photon counting BGO TOF-PET semi-monolithic detector concept.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Current Status of Cherenkov-Based Gamma Detectors for TOF-PET and Proton Range Verification.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- High-performance dual-ended SiPM readout for TOF-PET with BGO and LYSO:Ce.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Cherenkov over scintillation ratio using dichroic filters in BGO and TlCl for TOF-PET.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cross-Detection for Bubble-free Thermometer Codes and Dual-Side Monitoring for FPGA-Based High-Accuracy and High-Precision Time-to-Digital Converters.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe renewed interest in BGO scintillators for TOF-PET is driven by the improved Cherenkov photon detection with new blue-sensitive SiPMs. However, the slower scintillation light from BGO causes significant time walk with leading edge discrimination (LED), which degrades the coincidence time resolution (CTR). To address this, a time walk correction (TWC) can be done by using the rise time measured with a second threshold. Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can also enhance CTR by training with digitized waveforms. It remains to be explored how timing estimation methods utilizing one (LED), two (TWC), or multiple (CNN) waveform data points compare in CTR performance of BGO scintillators.
resultsIn this work, we compare classical experimental timing estimation methods (LED, TWC) with a CNN-based method using the signals from BGO crystals read out by NUV-HD-MT SiPMs and high-frequency electronics. For
conclusionsThe higher complexity of waveform digitization needed for CNNs could potentially be mitigated by adopting a simpler two-threshold approach, which appears to currently capture most of the essential information for improving CTR in longer BGO crystals. Other innovative deep learning models and training strategies may nonetheless contribute further in a near future to harnessing increasingly discernible timing features in TOF-PET detector signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.