Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821725›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025

Personalized neuron-specific enolase level based on EEG pattern for prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest.

Juliette Pelle, Estelle Pruvost-Robieux, Florence Dumas, Antonin Ginguay, Julien Charpentier, Clara Vigneron, Frédéric Pène, Jean Paul Mira, Alain Cariou, Sarah Benghanem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juliette PelleMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Estelle Pruvost-RobieuxUniversity Paris Cité - Medical School, Paris, France.
Florence DumasUniversity Paris Cité - Medical School, Paris, France.
Antonin GinguayClinical Chemistry Department, AP-HP Paris Centre, Cochin hospital, Paris, France.
Julien CharpentierMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Clara VigneronMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Frédéric PèneMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Jean Paul MiraMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Alain CariouMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France.
Sarah BenghanemMedical Intensive Care Unit, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Cochin hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris, 7501, France. sarah.benghanem@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter cardiac arrest (CA), the European recommendations suggest to use a neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level > 60 µg/L at 48-72 h to predict poor outcome. However, the prognostic performance of NSE can vary depending on electroencephalogram (EEG). The objective was to determine whether the NSE threshold which predicts poor outcome varies according to EEG patterns and the effect of electrographic seizures on NSE level.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary CA center, using a prospective registry of 155 adult patients comatose 72 h after CA. EEG patterns were classified according to the Westhall classification (benign, malignant or highly malignant). Neurological outcome was evaluated using the CPC scale at 3 months (CPC 3-5 defining a poor outcome).

resultsParticipants were 64 years old (IQR [53; 72,5]), and 74% were male. 83% were out-of-hospital CA and 48% were initial shockable rhythm. Electrographic seizures were observed in 5% and 8% of good and poor outcome patients, respectively (p = 0.50). NSE blood levels were significantly lower in the good outcome (median 20 µg/L IQR [15; 30]) compared to poor outcome group (median 110 µg/l IQR [49;308], p < 0,001). Benign EEG was associated with lower level of NSE compared to malignant and highly malignant patterns (p < 0.001). The NSE level was not significantly increased in patients with seizures as compared with malignant patterns (p = 0.15). In patients with a malignant EEG, a NSE > 45.2 µg/L was predictive of unfavorable outcome with 100% specificity and a higher sensitivity (70.8%) compared to the recommended NSE cut-off of 60 µg/l (Se = 66%). Combined to electrographic seizures, a NSE > 53.5 µg/L predicts poor outcome with 100% specificity and a higher sensitivity (77.7%) compared to the recommended cut-off (Se = 66.6%). Combined to a benign EEG, a NSE level > 78.2 µg/L was highly predictive of a poor outcome with a higher specificity (Sp = 100%) compared to the recommended cut-off (Sp = 94%).

conclusionIn comatose patients after AC, a personalized approach of NSE according to EEG pattern could improve the specificity and sensitivity of this biomarker for poor outcome prediction. Compared to others malignant EEG, no significant difference of NSE level was observed in case of electrographic seizures.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestComaElectroencephalogramNSEPrognostication

Identifiers

PMID39821725
PMCPMC11739441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.