ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDurvalumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin has shown a favorable benefit-risk profile in the TOPAZ-1 study for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC). This analysis evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of durvalumab, and exposure-response for efficacy and safety (ERES) of TOPAZ-1.
methodsThe PopPK model for durvalumab was updated using data from 5 previously analysed studies and TOPAZ-1. Individual exposure metrics were derived from the individual empirical Bayes estimates as drivers for exposure-response (ER) analysis related to efficacy and safety.
resultsConsistent with previous analyses, the durvalumab pharmacokinetics in BTC followed a 2-compartment model with time-dependent clearance. The final population parameters were: CL, 0.298 L/day; V1, 3.42 L; V2, 1.99 L; Q, 0.452 L/day; and the time dependent clearance suggests that the clearance could decrease up to 39% over the time course of treatment. There were 111 patients (3.53%) with treatment-emergent ADA positive in the pooled group of 6 studies, and the exposure was comparable for ADA positive and negative patients. Covariates had minimal clinical impact on PopPK parameters. No significant associations were found between exposure and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), using Cox proportional analysis (CPH). Logistic regression analysis indicated no significant relationship between the exposure and relevant adverse events measures of Grade 3 and higher treatment-related AE, Grade 3 and higher treatment-related AESI (AEs of special interest), or AE leading to treatment discontinuation.
conclusionsNo dose adjustment for durvalumab is needed based on PopPK and ERES analyses. The analysis supports the TOPAZ-1 regimen for patients with advanced BTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.