ArticleEcoHealth2025
Interactions Between Humans and White-Tailed Deer in Illinois: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has been found in multiple species, including cervids such as wild white-tailed deer (WTD), in multiple regions in the United States, including Illinois. The virus has been shown to transmit among WTD, and across species in both directions (deer-to-humans and humans-to-deer). Cross-species transmission requires infectious contact between WTD and humans, the form and frequency of which is poorly understood. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to understand the frequency and type of contact between the general public in the state of Illinois and WTD, and to identify human populations at highest risk for such contact. An online survey was distributed using convenience sampling from list serves, social media, and community partners or extension liaisons. Questions addressed frequency and distance of contact with WTD, encompassing live animals and bodily fluids. Standard and ordinal logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with contact. An overall risk score was calculated, and linear regression was used to identify factors associated with risk. We found that hunters and those who have deer feeding on their property are more likely to report contact with deer, and that people reporting a larger lot size and living in counties with higher proportions of potential deer habitat are more likely to report deer feeding on their property. These results will better identify people with a high likelihood of WTD contact for messaging and further research. Our survey did not distinguish between contact with live and dead WTD, thus the findings are most relevant to deer-to-human cross-species transmission than the human-to-deer direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.